college basketball

 

 

  College Basketball  NBA Draft  Recruiting  Preview  The Review  Store

  Email Page | Print Page |

 

college basketball tickets

 ▪ College Basketball Tickets - 200% Guarantee

 ▪ Get Your Final Four Tickets Here!

 

 

NAVIGATION

Ranking & Predictions

Division Two & Three

Awards / Features

Marketplace

Message Board

Coaching

Fantasy

Basketball History

CHN INFORMATION

 ▪ About CHN

 ▪ Write for CHN

 ▪ Advertising

 ▪ Links

Site Map

Teams List

VISIT OUR SPONSOR

 

 

 

 
 
 

NBA DRAFT PREVIEW: PART TWO

2005 NBA Draft | NBA Mock Draft | Player Profiles | Player Rankings

By Adam Stanco

basketballwriter@cs.com

June 26th, 2005

 

Part Two: Sippin' From NBA Draft Glasses

..continued from Page One

The two prep phenoms, Green and Webster, will shake up the early draft proceedings. Many scouts feel Green is the best all-around player available and Webster has the jumper, size, and athletic ability perfectly suited for an immediate impact into the pro game. The book on Webster is eerily similar to that of J.R. Smith, a high school player from last year’s draft class who averaged double-digits in his rookie season for the Hornets. Green and Webster could turn out to be the two most talented players available, but as is the case with any high school prospect, the risk is always high. Just ask execs from the Wizards and Cavaliers about Kwame Brown and DeSagana Diop.

The five best college point guards last season eligible for the 2005 draft are: Deron Williams, Paul, Felton, Jarrett Jack (Georgia Tech), and Nate Robinson (Washington). And not necessarily in that order. Felton should be in the lottery and Jack won’t fall far behind him. Robinson, due to his 5’9” size, could slip into the second round. Williams and Paul should both end up in the top five.

When Wake Forest lost at Illinois 91-73 on December 1st, Williams and Paul went head-to-Luther Head (another potential first round pick). Here’s how their stat lines compared in that blowout:

D. Williams

8 points (4-10 fg, 0-4 3fg), 11 assists, 5 rebounds, 1 steal, 4 turnovers, 25 minutes

 

C. Paul

10 points (4-11 fg, 1-3 3fg), 6 assists, 5 rebounds, 2 steals, 1 turnover, 30 minutes

Aside from the score of the game, Williams and Paul played to a statistical draw. Of course, the final score shouldn’t be discounted, but it was early in the season and the game was played in Champagne. Even more telling, however, is how comparable their statistics were. Both are impressive. For a six-footer, Paul’s line displays how easily he fills out an error free (one turnover in 30 minutes) box score. Meanwhile, even when Williams doesn’t score, he still dominates. Eleven assists in 25 minutes is harder to find on a college campus than a keg of O’Doul’s.

Each of the other three lead guards – Felton, Jack, and Robinson – offer valuable physical tools. Felton is incredibly fast, Jack is remarkably strong, and Robinson is both. Robinson is the wild-card of the 2005 Draft. His size is a possible first round deterrent, however his vertical leap is off the charts and intercepted two passes while starting for six games as a freshman defensive back for the Husky football team. The obvious NBA comparison for Robinson is Earl Boykins, yet Robinson is faster and a more gifted scorer. If nothing else, he’ll sell tickets at the next level.

Unless an improbable trade throws the front end of the draft into a tailspin, Marvin Williams and Bogut will go first and second overall. The Milwaukee Bucks get to decide which one will shake David Stern’s hand first. Scouts are divided on the impact each will have in the league. They are close in size and age (Bogut’s 20, Williams is 19) and light-years apart in accomplishments.

In just two seasons at Utah, Bogut earned every individual accolade possible, including National Player of the Year honors. He also scored 22 points and grabbed 18 boards against Team USA in the Olympics.

Williams won a championship at North Carolina, but he wasn’t even a starter. Apparently the drool NBA scouts spilled out over him during warm-ups was enough to consider him as a top two pick. Those are the kind of physical gifts (size, athletic ability, shooting form, etc.) he possesses. But he’s a risky pick. If Williams doesn’t break out into full-fledged superstardom, fans in Milwaukee or Atlanta won’t forgive easily (especially if Bogut does emerge).

If there is one player to watch for in the 2005 Draft it is former Arizona State forward Ike Diogu. Scouts are divided on his pro potential, but at ASU, Diogu was phenomenal. Despite very little national coverage, he was still a Second Team All-American last season and the Pac-10 Player of the Year. He has a tremendous wingspan, excellent understanding of how to play in the low post, and a great desire to succeed. The knock on Diogu is his 6-foot-8 height and questionable leaping ability, but he’s at least as explosive as Carlos Boozer was when he was at Duke. At the very least, expect Diogu to have more success than Danny Fortson and – judging by the boost Fortson gave the Sonics this past season – that’s a compliment.

Years from now we’ll say the Draft Glass of 2005 was filled with a myriad of exciting flavors. But if you want to fully enjoy it, just be sure not to pop open the bottle too soon.

Return to Page One

 

College Basketball Fan Shop

click to view